Why Tom Holland & Will Smith's 'Spies in Disguise' Deserved a Franchise (2026)

The Spy Franchise That Never Was: A Tale of Missed Opportunities and Hollywood’s Shifting Landscape

There’s something bittersweet about a great movie that never gets its sequel. Spies in Disguise, the 2019 animated spy comedy starring Tom Holland and Will Smith, is one such film. On paper, it had all the ingredients for a franchise: a dynamic lead duo, a clever premise, and a heartwarming message. Yet, it fizzled at the box office and was ultimately buried under the weight of corporate reshuffling. Personally, I think this story isn’t just about a missed opportunity—it’s a microcosm of how Hollywood’s priorities have shifted, often at the expense of creativity.

The Chemistry That Could Have Been

One thing that immediately stands out is the undeniable chemistry between Holland and Smith. Their mentor-mentee dynamic, flipped on its head when Smith’s character is turned into a pigeon, was pure gold. What makes this particularly fascinating is how the film subverted expectations. Smith, the suave, seasoned spy, loses his bravado, while Holland’s socially awkward scientist steps up. It’s a refreshing take on the buddy-cop formula, and it’s a shame audiences didn’t turn out in droves to see it.

What many people don’t realize is that this kind of pairing is rare in animated films. It’s not just about the voices—it’s about the energy they bring. Holland and Smith’s performances were so complementary that they could have easily carried multiple sequels. If you take a step back and think about it, this was a golden opportunity to create a franchise that appealed to both kids and adults, blending humor with a thoughtful anti-violence message.

The Box Office Blues

Here’s where things get tricky. Despite decent reviews and a respectable 76% Rotten Tomatoes score, Spies in Disguise grossed just $171.6 million against a $100 million budget. From my perspective, this isn’t a catastrophic failure, but it’s certainly underwhelming. What this really suggests is that even a well-executed film can struggle if it doesn’t capture the zeitgeist.

A detail that I find especially interesting is how this film compares to Blue Sky Studios’ other projects. Ferdinand and Epic, though not blockbuster hits, still outperformed Spies in Disguise. This raises a deeper question: Was the film marketed poorly? Or did audiences simply not connect with the concept? In my opinion, the latter is more likely. Spy comedies, especially animated ones, are a tough sell in a market saturated with superhero films and nostalgia-driven reboots.

Disney’s Shadow Looms Large

The timing of Spies in Disguise’s release couldn’t have been worse. The same year, Disney completed its acquisition of 20th Century Fox, effectively sealing Blue Sky Studios’ fate. What many people don’t realize is that Disney already had two powerhouse animation studios—Disney Animation and Pixar. Adding a third to the mix, especially during the pandemic, was never going to end well.

This raises a broader point about Hollywood’s consolidation. When mega-corporations like Disney dominate the industry, smaller studios and riskier projects often get left behind. Spies in Disguise wasn’t just a victim of poor box office performance—it was a casualty of a larger systemic shift. If you take a step back and think about it, this is a story about creativity being stifled by corporate strategy.

The Broader Implications

The failure of Spies in Disguise to launch a franchise isn’t just a loss for fans of the film—it’s a loss for the industry. It’s a reminder that even when all the pieces are in place, success isn’t guaranteed. What makes this particularly fascinating is how it reflects broader trends in Hollywood. Audiences are increasingly drawn to familiar properties, leaving original ideas struggling to find their footing.

Personally, I think this is a cautionary tale. While franchises like Ice Age can quietly become multi-billion-dollar juggernauts, not every film is destined for that kind of success. Sometimes, a great movie is just a great movie—and that’s okay. But in an industry that prioritizes profitability over creativity, even great movies can get lost in the shuffle.

Final Thoughts

Spies in Disguise is more than just a forgotten animated film—it’s a symbol of what could have been. It’s a reminder that Hollywood’s landscape is constantly evolving, often in ways that favor the safe over the innovative. From my perspective, this is a story worth telling, not just for its specifics but for what it says about the industry as a whole.

If there’s one takeaway, it’s this: sometimes, even the best-laid plans fall apart. But in those failures, there’s often a story worth exploring. And in the case of Spies in Disguise, it’s a story that’s both fascinating and deeply frustrating—a perfect blend of Hollywood magic and missed opportunities.

Why Tom Holland & Will Smith's 'Spies in Disguise' Deserved a Franchise (2026)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Arline Emard IV

Last Updated:

Views: 6457

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arline Emard IV

Birthday: 1996-07-10

Address: 8912 Hintz Shore, West Louie, AZ 69363-0747

Phone: +13454700762376

Job: Administration Technician

Hobby: Paintball, Horseback riding, Cycling, Running, Macrame, Playing musical instruments, Soapmaking

Introduction: My name is Arline Emard IV, I am a cheerful, gorgeous, colorful, joyous, excited, super, inquisitive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.